15 years
Thank you for your thoughtful ideas.
Why are dorms better?
I have just been writing the following para for uktrail.com, which neatly answers that question:
At UK Trail we give particular attention to solo travellers. Most single travellers want to keep their costs as low as possible, so that their funds will last longer. Therefore we focus on the costs of dorm beds. Many hostels also have private rooms, and if you are a couple or group, you may well prefer one, and they may not cost much more. But for a single traveller, they usually cost twice as much. Being willing to share a room gives you the option to pay the same as anyone else, and not, as in guest houses and bed-and-breakfasts, much more than anyone else.
For the single traveller, dorms are the only reasonable-priced option, whereas multi-travellers also have a choice of hotels, pensions, self-catering apartments, and "sobe" and "zimmer-frei"s. So, if adverts "don't bother" to mention dorms, they are further sidelining the single traveller.
Here is a related topic. We all know that self-catering kitchens are a valuable component of many hostels. However, hostels make more money from selling meals than encouraging self-catering. I was looking at the England&Wales YHA Guide (2007-08), and was perturbed by how few hostels have the "self-catering" symbol. Have they given up what we used to call "members' kitchens"? Eventually I realised that some hostels without the symbol do indeed have a guest kitchen, because I had stayed there and used it! But quite evidently they are ignoring the need to provide information and instead using their Guide to promote their meals service! Every hostel that provides meals has a sentence such as "Eat in and sample great local food" and does not mention self-catering. Only the hostels that do not have a meals service show the self-catering symbol. This may be good business sense, but it's yet another way in which the YHA is going back on what they originally stood for.
Log in to join discussion