Cuil.com - New Search Engine

It would be a big - and relatively easy - improvement if all the images only came from the pages that they are supposed to represent.

Also the layout would look less messy if the top baseline of each listing is aligned across all columns.

Also the description text doesn't come from the description tag, but instead the first text on the page. On many sites (including mine) the first text is the top and left hand-side menu.

I think it become a great success.Thank you fro such a big invention.Cuil searches more pages on the Web than anyone else—three times as many as Google and ten times as many as Microsoft.

I tried using Cuil for a little while but had to go back to Google because I couldn't find anything. I hope they can fix the problems...

I feel google's advantages are its number of pages searched, the relevance of searches (though this is always under threat of course) and the speed at which it re-indexes files. MS live search still had a link to our old site that has been down and unreachable for 5 months. While it wouldn't list our new site at all - 3 months after it was put up - and was on google and yahoo (strangely enough it's now up - a week after we put it on MSadcenter - co-incidence?). One thing tha google proved I think is that you'll get to number one as a search engine by results only - that's why its uncluttered interface succeeded so well. I remember back in the ollllld days using metacrawler - I used to like that - but within a few times of using google I had switched.

Whilst the results on google aren't perfect, I regularly try other searches, but haven't found anything better yet. I could imagine it would be reasonably easy to sell a new engine to some VCs and get a few million - bowls of strawberries aren't cheap after all!